The statements with which David Cameron, before the assembly of party delegates in Hampshire, returned yesterday to reject the multi-ethnic society alive and well right in this country that governs, not too many as it did weeks ago, have provoked strong controversy , as indeed it was very likely. Individually, however, the first answer was not the leader of the opposition Labour Ed Miliband, on the shoulders of the prime minister whose party has a responsibility to reverse years of misguided immigration policies.
So much so that Cameron has argued in line with the argument of "modern" European right, too much foreign labor creates the effect of scaring the British public. The reaction which then end up voting for racist and fascist vote, in this case the BNP. Syllogism that, mutatis mutandis, would apply to the political logic of other leading French, Dutch, Germans and their far-right movements.
How course fits very well with the parameters Italians. It fell to Vince Cable, considering the noble soul of the Lib-dem, and former Trade Minister, responsible for an attack tough ally of the government. Without immigrants, he reasoned Cable, modern Britain would not exist. Why are the ones who bring work and wealth.
Not to "steal" as Cameron, though only three lines, he suggested. Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, followed, perhaps despite himself, a fellow party member close by. Thus marking the ideological divide from one year to make the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in separate home after celebrating the marriage of convenience without winning the elections in May 2010.
Leaving aside considerations of how not only London but not Paris, New York, Sydney or Milan would be what they are without the work of those who migrate, yesterday's speech has a major impact on British domestic politics. In just over three weeks the country will vote for local elections, which for a very important referendum to change the electoral system.
Exactly a year after the formation of the first post-war coalition government, the political situation is tense. Conservatives have decided, courageously and tactically from their point of view, to take the bull by the horns, and cut government spending at the beginning of term, or where they are stronger (and more distant general election).
But now the economy is bad, youth unemployment is sky high for this latitude. And the discontent of the citizens against the dismantling of the welfare state is growing day by day. As the mounting resentment against Nick Clegg, quickly turned from hero of the new policy target of discontent, precisely because they have created high hopes and then dashed them within a political agreement with the Conservatives.
In addition, his party, in dramatic declines in support, is torn. The left internal mumbles, not now. It seems to quiver with joy every time he sees an escape from the bonds of common policies with the Tories, or upon striking the slightest result in government programs. The point is that with the speech yesterday, Prime Minister does not speak to his constituents that "right." But his allies, conservatives who are not, as they can feel at ease? Their dilemma is perpetuated: If you flatten Cameron forgiveness consents, votes for the upcoming elections, and even the face.
If you stir too ... well, could make the figure of the naughty child who does not want to be shareholders. For this reason, June 5 represents for them, and the fate of the coalition government, a major milestone. The UK citizens will be called the referendum to determine whether to maintain the current single-member constituency electoral system dry (First Past the Post, FPTP), or opt for the alternative vote (AV), which gives the candidate with more than one preference.
Not the system that the majority party once Lloyd George has always wanted, but at least better than nothing. Signed "blood" a year ago as a condition of participation in a government libdem, otherwise no majority. In short, the electoral timetable is why "behind the scenes for which there is so much nervousness in Westiminster area.
Just a couple of days ago, Gillian Duffy - a pensioner who pulled the ears of Labour Gordon Brown and what he called a "bigot" and emerged with broken bones for the fool - she caught Nick Clegg, and with the strength and spontaneity common sense, he asked: "Why did you put in coalition Nick? It was worth it for you? "The demand for Gillian, of course, is rhetorical.
Clegg is waiting for May 6 to decide if you should answer your question seriously. http://www. bbc. co. uk/news/uk-politics-13047156 
So much so that Cameron has argued in line with the argument of "modern" European right, too much foreign labor creates the effect of scaring the British public. The reaction which then end up voting for racist and fascist vote, in this case the BNP. Syllogism that, mutatis mutandis, would apply to the political logic of other leading French, Dutch, Germans and their far-right movements.
How course fits very well with the parameters Italians. It fell to Vince Cable, considering the noble soul of the Lib-dem, and former Trade Minister, responsible for an attack tough ally of the government. Without immigrants, he reasoned Cable, modern Britain would not exist. Why are the ones who bring work and wealth.
Not to "steal" as Cameron, though only three lines, he suggested. Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, followed, perhaps despite himself, a fellow party member close by. Thus marking the ideological divide from one year to make the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in separate home after celebrating the marriage of convenience without winning the elections in May 2010.
Leaving aside considerations of how not only London but not Paris, New York, Sydney or Milan would be what they are without the work of those who migrate, yesterday's speech has a major impact on British domestic politics. In just over three weeks the country will vote for local elections, which for a very important referendum to change the electoral system.
Exactly a year after the formation of the first post-war coalition government, the political situation is tense. Conservatives have decided, courageously and tactically from their point of view, to take the bull by the horns, and cut government spending at the beginning of term, or where they are stronger (and more distant general election).
But now the economy is bad, youth unemployment is sky high for this latitude. And the discontent of the citizens against the dismantling of the welfare state is growing day by day. As the mounting resentment against Nick Clegg, quickly turned from hero of the new policy target of discontent, precisely because they have created high hopes and then dashed them within a political agreement with the Conservatives.
In addition, his party, in dramatic declines in support, is torn. The left internal mumbles, not now. It seems to quiver with joy every time he sees an escape from the bonds of common policies with the Tories, or upon striking the slightest result in government programs. The point is that with the speech yesterday, Prime Minister does not speak to his constituents that "right." But his allies, conservatives who are not, as they can feel at ease? Their dilemma is perpetuated: If you flatten Cameron forgiveness consents, votes for the upcoming elections, and even the face.
If you stir too ... well, could make the figure of the naughty child who does not want to be shareholders. For this reason, June 5 represents for them, and the fate of the coalition government, a major milestone. The UK citizens will be called the referendum to determine whether to maintain the current single-member constituency electoral system dry (First Past the Post, FPTP), or opt for the alternative vote (AV), which gives the candidate with more than one preference.
Not the system that the majority party once Lloyd George has always wanted, but at least better than nothing. Signed "blood" a year ago as a condition of participation in a government libdem, otherwise no majority. In short, the electoral timetable is why "behind the scenes for which there is so much nervousness in Westiminster area.
Just a couple of days ago, Gillian Duffy - a pensioner who pulled the ears of Labour Gordon Brown and what he called a "bigot" and emerged with broken bones for the fool - she caught Nick Clegg, and with the strength and spontaneity common sense, he asked: "Why did you put in coalition Nick? It was worth it for you? "The demand for Gillian, of course, is rhetorical.
Clegg is waiting for May 6 to decide if you should answer your question seriously. http://www. bbc. co. uk/news/uk-politics-13047156
- Watch free live streaming Rochdale vs Charlton English League One (28/03/2011)
- Elderly man dies in Rochdale house fire (14/03/2011)
- Watch Free Hartlepool United vs Rochdale Live English League One Soccer Stream Online March-25-2011 (25/03/2011)
- 'Bigotgate' gran Gillian Duffy takes on Nick Clegg during Rochdale visit (12/04/2011)
- Woman driver, 18, airlifted to hospital after M62 crash near Rochdale (19/03/2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment