Sunday, May 8, 2011

The Clinton after the League

Hillary Clinton is playing in the dark and emotional event for the Pakistan office of uncertainty for the Italian event. The problem with the Italian event, the U.S. secretary of state, is that apparently is just easier to understand, clarify, organize, and tell. There's less drama, but Clinton quickly realized that there was something inexplicable, as in religions and traditions unknown.

What was discussed for a whole day, to end clashes with the world, the Italian Parliament, sharing not only between majority and opposition, but also within each discrete part and ferocity? The fact care about Clinton, because he will also make a report that one day Wikileaks spread around the world.

He knows, from seasoned statesman, who will speak at international meetings with a conventional language and largely false and that, typically, the Americans will say, on time and every time, what the Americans want to hear, because then the Americans pay off by saying the same currency in each country, to be close to the best friend of the United States.

The problem, however, is to understand what really happened in Italy and began with the strange and incomprehensible request to end the war, an unprecedented fact in every circumstance of history. The translation does not help. Translation means to take into account both the linguistic text (the talk, but also the things said or shouted before the talk) that the culture that supports and explains the text, all of which help to orient the true sense of political speeches or otherwise public in other cultures.

The team from the State Department has had a first, serious difficulty in understanding, and therefore to explain to their boss to visit, because the various Italian political parties had entered the fierce and determined to everything in the Chamber of Deputies on the morning of May 4, each determined to a decisive confrontation that would change Italian politics, and therefore the policy of alliances and international commitments, because they were out clearing, and each claiming victory, with a series of motions almost identical and, moreover, almost all agreed with reciprocal cross-votes or abstentions.

But a language barrier (or, at least at first glance, it seemed linguistic) slowed down the work of assistants and advisers to Hillary Clinton. And indeed it has been suggested to Secretary of State to make a long shopping trip to Rome, very exposed and very visible, in the days following the dramatic events of Pakistan, however, protected by helicopters that have occupied for hours at the sky and head of the Roman , just to have the time to solve the puzzle.

From the perspective of a major international event where you need to know for sure and report back to their country and the world that Italy will remain in place in the coalition, what it will mean a lengthy discussion all the same to the Chamber of Deputies, in which each party pulls on the same arguments, culminating understandable without political gains, but is celebrated with the phrase we have it hard.

The phrase itself is meaningless in political affairs, but is said and repeated by a leading Italian statesmen of the time, Reforms Minister Umberto Bossi, that Hillary Clinton has never had the opportunity to meet and whose activities do not have a clue, like most non-Italians condemned to know the local News.

That phrase has a mysterious sense with respect to Libya? Certain that the translators of the Embassy is that the State Department offered the translation dictionary. With a little 'embarrassed they told her: "Ma'am, do you mean, we have it hard." "No, no references to history. No, never was the pride of a warrior.

No, not even in Italy is a phrase of political jargon. Rather, it is a colloquialism for men who pride themselves .... " What kind of men? He wanted to know the Clintons. "Well, ma'am, say people who have raised a little 'elbow to the party of livestock and profits of the fact that wives do not feel." Mrs.

Clinton has seen many in the world and does not trust. He gave to her 24 hours to discover the meaning of that phrase, obviously in code. Withdrawal from Libya? Action guise of folklore to give more time to Gaddafi? These opponents of the United States or under cover of peace activists decided to do anything to stop the action of NATO? But Italy was not an extravagant (the one making the horns in the international summits) but reliable friend of America? You may have noticed that when the political event itself began, Clinton has never done to find near Frattini.

Maybe in private, because it is a persistent woman, and also concerned about the insignificant details in the politics of the world (Bossi, the League). And it appears that you have tried (unsuccessfully) to obtain the true translation of the phrase encrypted leader of a party of Italian Government.

In his spare time, Clinton also tried to get an explanation why the Italian opposition had not committed, at least as a favor to her, to question, condemn, ridicule, and then try to delete that phrase apparently meaning. "And because those who are opposed to the other are the same in Italy?" He continued in vain to ask the Clinton advisors to his bewildered, still trying to unravel a puzzle that even the Italians of the highest institutional level have solved that thing is, what should be the opposition in this beautiful Mediterranean country? In conclusion, Hillary Clinton has been careful not to ever be close to the Italian Foreign Minister Frattini, not to appear in an embarrassing situation in American newspapers.

In fact, if the man is, as it is deployed on the same side of the mysterious group We have it hard can suddenly play some unpleasant international joke. The Clinton administration has been right. He had not yet left Rome that even the agency of the Italian mobile phone text message record: Frattini: "The mission will end in four weeks in Libya." Someone says: "In four days." We have to wait (not so) until the next Wikileaks to know the American trial on this trip, but one thing is certain: no country that faces a debate in the House unnecessary to meet the challenge of a useless party unrelated to any foreign policy, and elected engaged only in local politics (but Berlusconi, who needs the votes, pretends that this is a European party) on a question that never gets mail and who do not get a response ever (apart from Italy of Values, but participated in one of his lonely and different debate on peace and war) and where all proudly declare themselves to be winners, can not have respect and listening and international reputation.

At best, and fully consistent with our recent past, have asked this devastated republic, to take charge of Gaddafi exile, hospitality tent included. , May 8, 2011

No comments:

Post a Comment