Mission accomplished. Osama Bin Laden was killed. E 'then the time to leave the Afghansitan? American media apart from the debate on what will become of the war on terror, now that the number one enemy of the United States was made out of a blitz of Marines selected. Who have discovered near Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan.
The Huffington Post points out that after the invasion of Afghanistan by American troops, President George W. Bush said he wanted the head of Al Qaeda "dead or alive." The capture or death of bin Laden's main objective is to defeat international terrorism, then. With that goal achieved, a decade later and under another president, "some say - writes Arianna Huffington's blog - that the reasons for withdrawal are now stronger and Barack Obama political cover to push for a solution to this type ".
Many U.S. lawmakers, in their initial comments, have not included the killing of Bin Laden in the broader context of the conflict in Afghanistan. But according to the Huffington Post is clear that the debate over U.S. military strategy should be influenced by the death of the leader of Al Qaeda.
A demonstration of this site quotes the words of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who stressed that Bin Laden was hiding "in the deep heart of Pakistan" and criticized the continuing operations in his country: "The war against terrorism is not in Afghanistan - Karzai said -. The war on terror is not in Afghan villages, the homes of innocent Afghans, in the bombing and killing of women and children, but out of Afghanistan, in safe havens of terrorism.
" The Los Angeles Times wonders if the Americans try devano leaders terrorist actions in places like Pakistan, or continue to hold tens of thousands of soldiers to the war in Afghanistan. Given that many Al Qaeda fighters have now found refuge in the tribal areas of Pakistan. The killing of Bin Laden, says the Californian newspaper, leads many politicians to reconsider their support of "a strategy that costs billions of dollars a year and has so far failed to defeat the Taliban actions against a government-backed ".
Bin Laden has been found in the heart of Pakistan is the starting point of an article in the New York Times and STRATEGY on the roadmap of operations in Afghanistan. Where, the newspaper notes, "100 thousand American troops are still fighting a war to destroy Al Qaeda." The raid against the terrorist leader comes at time when Obama has to decide how many troops call.
The pressure on U.S. president to accelerate the phase increase, writes the New York Times, despite John O. Brennan, presidential adviser on counter-terrorism, has declared that "the presence of NATO troops in Afghanistan is still necessary to prevent that country again become the starting point of Al Qaeda." 
The Huffington Post points out that after the invasion of Afghanistan by American troops, President George W. Bush said he wanted the head of Al Qaeda "dead or alive." The capture or death of bin Laden's main objective is to defeat international terrorism, then. With that goal achieved, a decade later and under another president, "some say - writes Arianna Huffington's blog - that the reasons for withdrawal are now stronger and Barack Obama political cover to push for a solution to this type ".
Many U.S. lawmakers, in their initial comments, have not included the killing of Bin Laden in the broader context of the conflict in Afghanistan. But according to the Huffington Post is clear that the debate over U.S. military strategy should be influenced by the death of the leader of Al Qaeda.
A demonstration of this site quotes the words of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who stressed that Bin Laden was hiding "in the deep heart of Pakistan" and criticized the continuing operations in his country: "The war against terrorism is not in Afghanistan - Karzai said -. The war on terror is not in Afghan villages, the homes of innocent Afghans, in the bombing and killing of women and children, but out of Afghanistan, in safe havens of terrorism.
" The Los Angeles Times wonders if the Americans try devano leaders terrorist actions in places like Pakistan, or continue to hold tens of thousands of soldiers to the war in Afghanistan. Given that many Al Qaeda fighters have now found refuge in the tribal areas of Pakistan. The killing of Bin Laden, says the Californian newspaper, leads many politicians to reconsider their support of "a strategy that costs billions of dollars a year and has so far failed to defeat the Taliban actions against a government-backed ".
Bin Laden has been found in the heart of Pakistan is the starting point of an article in the New York Times and STRATEGY on the roadmap of operations in Afghanistan. Where, the newspaper notes, "100 thousand American troops are still fighting a war to destroy Al Qaeda." The raid against the terrorist leader comes at time when Obama has to decide how many troops call.
The pressure on U.S. president to accelerate the phase increase, writes the New York Times, despite John O. Brennan, presidential adviser on counter-terrorism, has declared that "the presence of NATO troops in Afghanistan is still necessary to prevent that country again become the starting point of Al Qaeda."
- 'Motherlode' of Data Seized At Bin Laden Compound (03/05/2011)
- Bush Gave Up On Bin Laden; Obama Got The Job Done (03/05/2011)
- Will Bin Laden's death hasten withdrawal from Afghanistan? (03/05/2011)
- In Wake of Bin Laden Death, Calls for Afghanistan Withdrawal Increase (03/05/2011)
- Bin Laden story shows changing media nature (03/05/2011)
Osama bin Laden (wikipedia) Frost over the World - Benazir Bhutto - 02 Nov 07 (youtube) Afghanistan (lonelyplanet) Afghanistan (geolocation) Afghanistan (homepage) Afghanistan (wikipedia) Massoud's Last Stand - Afghanistan (youtube) Starving to Death - Afghanistan (youtube) 01.06 Shah Massoud in European Parliament 05 March 2001 (youtube) Inside the Taliban 06 - N.G. (youtube) BRIGADE 055 (youtube)
No comments:
Post a Comment