War is the opposite of peace and pacifism is a variant of the second backdoor. The peace movement has always opposed intervention against dictatorships invoking peace, which has a relative value when it is not accompanied by freedom and justice. Pacifism in 1938 he opposed intervention against the rise of Hitler.
In the '50s, pacifism supported the Soviet regime and its neighbors. In general pacifism, almost always anti-American and anti / Israel ends all support for anti schemes / West. Having an ethics that compels me to preface my Western prejudices, I declare to be immediately pro-American & pro-Israeli.
The reasons why I would see in favor of a Libyan military intervention in the crisis and not just in it are varied, but the space of a post allows me to mention only some of them. Assuming that Russia and the league are against it, not to mention the ambiguity of the rest of the government, I believe that the advantages of a military intervention might be relevant: Gaddafi unseat subtracting from the hands, the same as the Cayman kissed, the massacre of more or less defenseless civilians, forcing Government & Parliament italioti to invalidate the "Treaty unusual" (New York Times yesterday), which prohibits any action against Libya, and any interference in its affairs, be present in an area where terrorist groups could take root ; contain the soaring price of oil & so on.
Today's study compared the views of Furio Colombo and Massimo Fini, both unfavorable to an armed interevento in Libya, and opinions favorable Giampiero Gramaglia and General Fabio Mini. Colombo, referring to the experiences of Iraq and Afghanistan were found to be purely negative, expressed his "no to another war that you can not win." While Gramaglia said yes, provided that armed intervention is taking place "in international law." Even more favorable Mini General, which states "to act with weapons is a necessity." Offset by the strictly against review of Fini, which rely on the principle of self-determination (Charter of the Helsinki '75), under which the "issue must be resolved between Libya from the Libyans." Fini is also contrary to the so / called peace-keeping operations, which in his opinion were resolved into their opposite (Afghanistan, Kosovo and Serbia), as the 'peace operations' are acceptable only when the international forces are interposed, by a buffer, as in Lebanon, between two communities that do not belong to the same state.
Massimo Fini still on the fact of February 26, in the beginning of the end piece, said that "the popular uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Bahrain marked the beginning of the end of the American Empire and Western Europe, those regions. Since they won the Second World War, the United States, despite all their fine words about democracy, supported the most infamous dictators, corrupt and bloodthirsty, as long as they did the comfortable, when they are not directly instigated the military coup.
And that's imperialist realpolitik has always backfired and put them in untenable situations. " Massimo Fini enumerates all the other havoc Amerikan "support for the Cuban dictator Batista generated Castroism (...) The support for the Shah of Persia glossy gave birth to Khomeini (...) Support for" Afghan warlords, Massoud, Dostum, Ismail Khan (...) put them in an untenable situation, since the guerrillas took control of 80% of the country, so now go around and saucer pity mediation by Mullah Omar (...) The U.S.
has supported the Tunisian dictator Ben Ali, (...) the Egyptian dictator Mubarak (...) in 1991, supported the general cut-Algerians (...) Now the riots in the Maghreb, Egypt, Bahrain (...) and Libya (...) But d ' now they will be much more difficult to control the various situations. The outlet of these riots, they say, is unpredictable.
Not really. It is very likely that these people once freed of dictators, end up, sooner or later, to become independent even from the puppeteer who for decades has operated them for his own use and consumption. My impression is that this meritorious, analytically speaking, close examination of Massimo Fini, suppose a sort of world-vacuum or vacuum of power where, if there were and there were no Amerikan, all people would go and should be d 'Love & agree, as if already in essence there were other claimants to the creation of another Empire which once escaped from the hands Amerikan (or Anglo-Saxon), will be, as has historically happened, picked up by other witnesses , be they Chinese, Indians, Brazilians and others - with methods of administration of power, justice and the distribution of resources, perhaps less than hoped to present. 
In the '50s, pacifism supported the Soviet regime and its neighbors. In general pacifism, almost always anti-American and anti / Israel ends all support for anti schemes / West. Having an ethics that compels me to preface my Western prejudices, I declare to be immediately pro-American & pro-Israeli.
The reasons why I would see in favor of a Libyan military intervention in the crisis and not just in it are varied, but the space of a post allows me to mention only some of them. Assuming that Russia and the league are against it, not to mention the ambiguity of the rest of the government, I believe that the advantages of a military intervention might be relevant: Gaddafi unseat subtracting from the hands, the same as the Cayman kissed, the massacre of more or less defenseless civilians, forcing Government & Parliament italioti to invalidate the "Treaty unusual" (New York Times yesterday), which prohibits any action against Libya, and any interference in its affairs, be present in an area where terrorist groups could take root ; contain the soaring price of oil & so on.
Today's study compared the views of Furio Colombo and Massimo Fini, both unfavorable to an armed interevento in Libya, and opinions favorable Giampiero Gramaglia and General Fabio Mini. Colombo, referring to the experiences of Iraq and Afghanistan were found to be purely negative, expressed his "no to another war that you can not win." While Gramaglia said yes, provided that armed intervention is taking place "in international law." Even more favorable Mini General, which states "to act with weapons is a necessity." Offset by the strictly against review of Fini, which rely on the principle of self-determination (Charter of the Helsinki '75), under which the "issue must be resolved between Libya from the Libyans." Fini is also contrary to the so / called peace-keeping operations, which in his opinion were resolved into their opposite (Afghanistan, Kosovo and Serbia), as the 'peace operations' are acceptable only when the international forces are interposed, by a buffer, as in Lebanon, between two communities that do not belong to the same state.
Massimo Fini still on the fact of February 26, in the beginning of the end piece, said that "the popular uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Bahrain marked the beginning of the end of the American Empire and Western Europe, those regions. Since they won the Second World War, the United States, despite all their fine words about democracy, supported the most infamous dictators, corrupt and bloodthirsty, as long as they did the comfortable, when they are not directly instigated the military coup.
And that's imperialist realpolitik has always backfired and put them in untenable situations. " Massimo Fini enumerates all the other havoc Amerikan "support for the Cuban dictator Batista generated Castroism (...) The support for the Shah of Persia glossy gave birth to Khomeini (...) Support for" Afghan warlords, Massoud, Dostum, Ismail Khan (...) put them in an untenable situation, since the guerrillas took control of 80% of the country, so now go around and saucer pity mediation by Mullah Omar (...) The U.S.
has supported the Tunisian dictator Ben Ali, (...) the Egyptian dictator Mubarak (...) in 1991, supported the general cut-Algerians (...) Now the riots in the Maghreb, Egypt, Bahrain (...) and Libya (...) But d ' now they will be much more difficult to control the various situations. The outlet of these riots, they say, is unpredictable.
Not really. It is very likely that these people once freed of dictators, end up, sooner or later, to become independent even from the puppeteer who for decades has operated them for his own use and consumption. My impression is that this meritorious, analytically speaking, close examination of Massimo Fini, suppose a sort of world-vacuum or vacuum of power where, if there were and there were no Amerikan, all people would go and should be d 'Love & agree, as if already in essence there were other claimants to the creation of another Empire which once escaped from the hands Amerikan (or Anglo-Saxon), will be, as has historically happened, picked up by other witnesses , be they Chinese, Indians, Brazilians and others - with methods of administration of power, justice and the distribution of resources, perhaps less than hoped to present.
- Clothing As A Metaphor: The Clothing Sculptures of Guerra de la Paz (08/03/2011)
- Layali Ida Guerra Faraj : Peru (01/03/2011)
- Maria Georgina Guerra Gómez : Colombia (03/03/2011)
- Interview with Rui Guerra about online strategies for cultural spaces (22/02/2011)
- The Securities Law Firm of Tramont Guerra & Nunez, PA Announces Investigation of Potential Legal Claims for Investors in Puerto Rico Conservation Trust Fund Secured Notes (04/03/2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment