Only four days ago thundered on television: "The plants have been shown to keep knock, who was inspired by the tragedy of Japan to create a political controversy is a jackal. We will see in the coming days, but I'm confident. " Then, overwhelmed by the criticism, even the former president of Legambiente Chicco Testa, president of the Italian Nuclear Forum, the most fervent supporters of the return of the atom in the beautiful country, made a reverse and "was inspired by the tragedy" for a healthy debate.
The turnabout comes under the tentative title "We need a pause to learn from mistakes" and stands in the Corriere della Sera, which devoted a page to the nuclear debate between supporters and opponents. Head still among the first, but just read his statements to understand the complacency of a few days ago has dissolved.
"What is happening in Japan - says head - is much more serious than anyone could imagine. [...] Must admit without hesitation and a sense of responsibility are also those who, like me and many others, technicians, scientists, politicians, ordinary people, is a staunch supporter of the utility of nuclear energy.
" But continuous text, speaks of "reconsideration" of the industry. Responsibility to guide the European Union and the need for "broad consensus". In short, a reverse full-scale reversal of the trend that looks very staged by the government. Proponents of nuclear power in government sauce, for that matter, can say one thing and its opposite - the position now held with the same certainty as of yesterday - the same way that Superman was changed clothes and was flying at the speed of light in sky with the perfect hair grease, never even ruffled a bit '.
Even in the executive, until all'altroieri the watchword was "full speed ahead." Then the situation in Japan has fallen, bringing with it the certainty that nuclear government has in fact approved by legislative decree an empty box. The reverse - for charity, well accepted even in its hypocrisy - it came from the Secretary Saglia, who has delegated to the regions the right to say yes or no (except that everyone will say no, because as you know, everyone likes the nuclear when it is in other people's homes).
As Environment Minister Prestigiacomo, who has gone from saying "the government's plans do not change" to the softer "put our strategy into the European Union." The point here is not whether the various tests, and Saglia Prestigiacomo (and all others) were right before or now. The point is, if anything, what with such sudden swiftness smuova what until recently was a granite conviction of being right in a new light as granite.
It is suspected that the end is what matters, beyond what is said, seem more convincing than to be convinced. 
The turnabout comes under the tentative title "We need a pause to learn from mistakes" and stands in the Corriere della Sera, which devoted a page to the nuclear debate between supporters and opponents. Head still among the first, but just read his statements to understand the complacency of a few days ago has dissolved.
"What is happening in Japan - says head - is much more serious than anyone could imagine. [...] Must admit without hesitation and a sense of responsibility are also those who, like me and many others, technicians, scientists, politicians, ordinary people, is a staunch supporter of the utility of nuclear energy.
" But continuous text, speaks of "reconsideration" of the industry. Responsibility to guide the European Union and the need for "broad consensus". In short, a reverse full-scale reversal of the trend that looks very staged by the government. Proponents of nuclear power in government sauce, for that matter, can say one thing and its opposite - the position now held with the same certainty as of yesterday - the same way that Superman was changed clothes and was flying at the speed of light in sky with the perfect hair grease, never even ruffled a bit '.
Even in the executive, until all'altroieri the watchword was "full speed ahead." Then the situation in Japan has fallen, bringing with it the certainty that nuclear government has in fact approved by legislative decree an empty box. The reverse - for charity, well accepted even in its hypocrisy - it came from the Secretary Saglia, who has delegated to the regions the right to say yes or no (except that everyone will say no, because as you know, everyone likes the nuclear when it is in other people's homes).
As Environment Minister Prestigiacomo, who has gone from saying "the government's plans do not change" to the softer "put our strategy into the European Union." The point here is not whether the various tests, and Saglia Prestigiacomo (and all others) were right before or now. The point is, if anything, what with such sudden swiftness smuova what until recently was a granite conviction of being right in a new light as granite.
It is suspected that the end is what matters, beyond what is said, seem more convincing than to be convinced.
No comments:
Post a Comment