The double meaning of the Libyan strategies

Here are some questions (and possible answers) that we made on the conflict in Libya. Why does the international community has moved only at the last possible moment and in any order? More than the "coalition of the willing" that is attacking Libya appears to be the 'army of reluctant "between distinctions, exceptions and partial commitment, only two weeks ago it seemed that only a little push to dislodge the dictator would have been done (albeit with the bad), but seemed to lack the fundamental motivation: an official document that would allow the act or resolution which took away the doubts about action without the "cover" (or umbrella) impartial, the United Nations (perhaps sheet the former with the U.S.

What solution to the crisis Libya?

Eventually the United Nations Security Council failed to adopt a resolution, No. 1973, 2011, which aims to provide a solution to the crisis in Libya. Moving in the wake of the previous Resolution 1970, the new resolution will strengthen certain mechanisms to inhibit the use of armed violence by the Gaddafi regime, such as the arms embargo, asset freeze and travel ban against certain people.

There are two important innovations: the measures to ensure the protection of civilians and the no-fly zone. The Security Council authorized Member States to take "all necessary measures" to protect civilians and areas inhabited by them, with the exception of the military, but instead include the supply of weapons to the insurgents, as shown by reference paragraph 9 of Resolution 1970.

A minority dittaturadi

"Fool! You will make the end of Ceausescu. " Bah. Meanwhile, Gaddafi is likely to make it really, the end of Ceaucescu. Gliel'avrebbe Who said this summer, at the time of the Bedouin tents (in Rome) and bungabunga? I am a prudent man, in place of Berlusconi slingshot me into the nearest police station, I lock myself in the cell as a personal favor to me and ask to be placed in the innermost chamber of security: you never know.