All the West is uncertain outcome of the revolution that shakes Libya, with the insurgents who look to Tripoli city liberated from the regime that shoots into the crowd and promised reforms now that would not be granted for 42 years. In Europe, Italy to Malta is the country most exposed to the explosion in front of Libya.
For this reason, if you include the concerns of the government is also right to demand clarity in behavior, and even earlier on political judgments. Italy, with its Premier and his Foreign Minister, arrived at last to condemn the violence, and still has not called for as the dictatorial regime against which the people fell into the streets in defiance of the weapons and mercenaries Colonel.
From this inability to judge (who was born of embarrassment for the repeated kissing Gaddafi to Berlusconi) derives a position-west: it reduces the issue to an emergency home for the Libyan wave of immigration, while it is a matter of great freedom that the West invests. Incredibly, our government continues to think that Gaddafi could still negotiate a reform plan with his people, as if he had the credibility and legitimacy.
Equally incredibly, it is believed that the dictator could be the star of a national reconciliation plan, after Obama spoke of a violent regime "that violates human dignity." It is humiliating that the warships in the Mediterranean takes the premier government and parliament in check for five measures of safe conduct by studying its processes: short limitation, conflict of competence, admissibility, trial brief, as the reform of the Consulta.
Someone explain that when people can regain their freedom, the West has a duty to correct that is first of all: be on their side. This and only this is the answer to the threat of a shift in Islamic. Not mediation with dictators. 
For this reason, if you include the concerns of the government is also right to demand clarity in behavior, and even earlier on political judgments. Italy, with its Premier and his Foreign Minister, arrived at last to condemn the violence, and still has not called for as the dictatorial regime against which the people fell into the streets in defiance of the weapons and mercenaries Colonel.
From this inability to judge (who was born of embarrassment for the repeated kissing Gaddafi to Berlusconi) derives a position-west: it reduces the issue to an emergency home for the Libyan wave of immigration, while it is a matter of great freedom that the West invests. Incredibly, our government continues to think that Gaddafi could still negotiate a reform plan with his people, as if he had the credibility and legitimacy.
Equally incredibly, it is believed that the dictator could be the star of a national reconciliation plan, after Obama spoke of a violent regime "that violates human dignity." It is humiliating that the warships in the Mediterranean takes the premier government and parliament in check for five measures of safe conduct by studying its processes: short limitation, conflict of competence, admissibility, trial brief, as the reform of the Consulta.
Someone explain that when people can regain their freedom, the West has a duty to correct that is first of all: be on their side. This and only this is the answer to the threat of a shift in Islamic. Not mediation with dictators.
No comments:
Post a Comment