The setback

According to the lawyer Andreozzi, Battisti on the case, with the excuse of the setback suffered, we see the national press - including - nell'avvallare cravings lynchings & burning for hours just figured, but extremely significant. As there is no doubt that the methods used in the process of conviction in absentia of Cesare Battisti are the foundation of repentance in the statements of two Pac (Armed Proletarians for Communism), interested in the form of perpetrators of certain crimes, thanks to the benefit of pentitismo with the usual reduction of sentences and so on, and if there is not doubt that the processes were carried out according to a Codest, whose main concern lies not in the course of defending rights of the accused, the question arises of whether the award of Battisti was a guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, or rather in following a series of doubts and contradictions, which, rather than the innocence of Baptists affirm his own, at least according to the style of a modern accusatory process, all'amerikana to speak.

Without these, associated with substantial outbuildings & French and Brazilian public opinion contrary to the foregoing sentences, like those of celebrities such as, for example, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Daniel Pennac, Gabriel García Márquez and Fred Vargas, mocked writer engagée of, very far removed from our own progress in the Chianti shire cashmere and so on.

And so the eternal anxiety compulsive italiotta fans - soccer player living home & car manufacturer Ferrari and who cares - the illusion of hanging Baptists to its responsibilities, has finally lead to, thus justifying asylum in Battisti granted by Brazil, after the Baptists had long enjoyed in France of Mitterand doctrine.

If this is the So Called (read italiotto), it would be good to consider also that the worthy brasileiro first leftist president Lula, who has just handed the mandate to the newly elected president of his own party - the PT - already tortured for 22 days from 22 Doi-Codi, military & paramilitary organization during the dictatorship of the generals tried, even under torture assisted by medical personnel (sic), to destroy, apparently without success, the extensive Brazilian left.

In those circumstances, one can assume that Lula addressed to Rousseff, she may have said: (brasileiro means in ham), and so on. In short, it seems, or does not seem improbable that a and one, they agreed to extradite an alleged terrorist from left-to-government components at least tout court? Having lived in Brazil for several decades, including the tail end of the military dictatorship (1964-1985), this extradition to me seemed quite as it seems to me that the facts have, at least so far, proved.