You know that I am not much of Italian business, but last night I went into the drafting of a newspaper. I have not changed my mind, quite the contrary, I made some observations, some comparisons between the political loser of an Asian country, Nepal, and ours. Fax came to bank accounts (it's illegal? No, really?), Were based on telephone calls to escort with aspirations or inspirations arcoriane, please read the information and watched the video of scantily clad beautiful ladies - all similar, among other things: the perfect faces accompanied by smiles and twinkling eyes, lascivious, waterfalls and long hair dyed, huge tits and rebuilt so that the smell of silicone, or whatever it is, came out from the monitor.
I mean, not that shocked me so much of the facts of our republic, but a comparison I did, I admit. And we have come out winners. Nepal, you know, is a beautiful country and jello. Over a century of authoritarian monarchy with a king desautorato of its powers to control and where was the hereditary prime minister, who held the country into a feudal state, then the revolution of 1951 that deposed the prime minister, but not quite the his caste, yet rich and powerful, June 1, 2001 killed by his son King Birendra, his wife and nine members of his family, the uprising of the Maoist movement which began in 1996 and King Gyanendra, his successor, February 1, 2005 that establishes a dictatorial regime with the pretext to deal with the Maoists.
The bloody civil war the country until the revolution of 2006, when it is restored parliament and was elected a Maoist government (as we would have to say about these Maoism Maoist). Now Nepal has become a federal democratic republic, secular - the first was the only Hindu country in the world - where minorities are protected, and so on.
In addition to the disadvantaged castes and ethnic groups, transsexuals also have their constitutionally recognized rights, the children of prostitutes and so on., A whole category of people who were first-class citizens Z. And yet, Nepal is facing in economic dire conditions, with an unemployment rate of 46% which places it at the 192 th place in the world, according to the latest report by the CIA in Italy which sees only the 7.80% unemployment in 2008.
The parties are drafting the final constitution, but they have postponed the publication of the work already twice in two years. The Maoists, who have obtained a relative majority of votes in the first free elections, are not able to form a government of a strong political alliance and the struggle between them and the second largest party in the country, the Nepali Congress, effectively blocking the reforms and even the election of a prime minister.
That when there is: there is no final constitution, there is no prime minister. Yet Nepal is much better than Italy. This definitely beats - and not because there are no allegations of luxuries to the Maoists. Not corruption, as with politicians before, but luxuries and pleasures (in the end, after many years of famine and political isolation and logistics, people now want to live well, even the leaders of a Maoist party).
Things considered inappropriate from a party that declares itself Maoist. But Nepal beats Italy with a victory in the full sense of responsibility and morality on the part of politicians, even those of one of the world's most militant parties, the Maoists, who in 1996 declared war on the king and his army , for instance, and sparked the civil war.
Former Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, a former comrade Prachanda, the first prime minister of Nepal's democratic history and now secretary of Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), has resigned in May 2009 after trying unsuccessfully to require the reinstatement of former Maoist fighters into the ranks of the regular army.
The reason was the attempt to dismiss Prachanda General Rookmangud Katawal, chief of army staff, who had refused to integrate former combatants. The president, Ram Baran Yadav, has declared the act unconstitutional and Prachanda, but said the intrusion of Ram Baran unconstitutional (which is true), has resigned to protect democracy and the peace process, as stated in a televised speech himself.
How many Italian politicians would do the same? At the end of that month he was appointed prime minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist), which was placed at the head of a coalition government. Nepal has been in office for just over a year, until June 30, 2010, for the opposition and the Maoists, who obviously want a majority government with a Maoist Maoist prime minister.
Even though he has resigned to avoid dropping the country into a political impasse detrimental to the interests of all and now governs in a coalition government without being formally interim prime minister. The constitutional and political debate continues and the country was not locked.
I repeat: How many Italian politicians would do? Now, I do not want morals and moralism, nor, obviously, I would give advice to anyone, let alone to our Prime Minister, elected by the majority of Italians, no doubt, but it seems to me that in Italy the media and all debates revolve around Berlusconi's friend and escort, escort or not, a good part of the government, as well as the Italians would like the prime minister acted as a part (although the last confidence vote, which was plenty of "negotiation", I think : and then say of haggling in Asia).
In other words, Berlusconi has tired many many many, the story of her partying and her erotic-sentimental story are monopolizing the country, engaged im investigations, including investigations and debates in the media. But it could take a leaf from the politicians in a country that has often been mentioned as a symbol of political backwardness and economic structure of feudalism, and so on? It could not resign, leaving his niche, so much money and power already has more than enough, and restore air and breath to Italy, maybe we could deal with something other than that of its young ladies? Italy leave and maybe, just maybe, we could also, over time, to rebuild credibility in international politics.
At least not to lose even with Nepal on the playground of democracy.
I mean, not that shocked me so much of the facts of our republic, but a comparison I did, I admit. And we have come out winners. Nepal, you know, is a beautiful country and jello. Over a century of authoritarian monarchy with a king desautorato of its powers to control and where was the hereditary prime minister, who held the country into a feudal state, then the revolution of 1951 that deposed the prime minister, but not quite the his caste, yet rich and powerful, June 1, 2001 killed by his son King Birendra, his wife and nine members of his family, the uprising of the Maoist movement which began in 1996 and King Gyanendra, his successor, February 1, 2005 that establishes a dictatorial regime with the pretext to deal with the Maoists.
The bloody civil war the country until the revolution of 2006, when it is restored parliament and was elected a Maoist government (as we would have to say about these Maoism Maoist). Now Nepal has become a federal democratic republic, secular - the first was the only Hindu country in the world - where minorities are protected, and so on.
In addition to the disadvantaged castes and ethnic groups, transsexuals also have their constitutionally recognized rights, the children of prostitutes and so on., A whole category of people who were first-class citizens Z. And yet, Nepal is facing in economic dire conditions, with an unemployment rate of 46% which places it at the 192 th place in the world, according to the latest report by the CIA in Italy which sees only the 7.80% unemployment in 2008.
The parties are drafting the final constitution, but they have postponed the publication of the work already twice in two years. The Maoists, who have obtained a relative majority of votes in the first free elections, are not able to form a government of a strong political alliance and the struggle between them and the second largest party in the country, the Nepali Congress, effectively blocking the reforms and even the election of a prime minister.
That when there is: there is no final constitution, there is no prime minister. Yet Nepal is much better than Italy. This definitely beats - and not because there are no allegations of luxuries to the Maoists. Not corruption, as with politicians before, but luxuries and pleasures (in the end, after many years of famine and political isolation and logistics, people now want to live well, even the leaders of a Maoist party).
Things considered inappropriate from a party that declares itself Maoist. But Nepal beats Italy with a victory in the full sense of responsibility and morality on the part of politicians, even those of one of the world's most militant parties, the Maoists, who in 1996 declared war on the king and his army , for instance, and sparked the civil war.
Former Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, a former comrade Prachanda, the first prime minister of Nepal's democratic history and now secretary of Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), has resigned in May 2009 after trying unsuccessfully to require the reinstatement of former Maoist fighters into the ranks of the regular army.
The reason was the attempt to dismiss Prachanda General Rookmangud Katawal, chief of army staff, who had refused to integrate former combatants. The president, Ram Baran Yadav, has declared the act unconstitutional and Prachanda, but said the intrusion of Ram Baran unconstitutional (which is true), has resigned to protect democracy and the peace process, as stated in a televised speech himself.
How many Italian politicians would do the same? At the end of that month he was appointed prime minister Madhav Kumar Nepal, Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist), which was placed at the head of a coalition government. Nepal has been in office for just over a year, until June 30, 2010, for the opposition and the Maoists, who obviously want a majority government with a Maoist Maoist prime minister.
Even though he has resigned to avoid dropping the country into a political impasse detrimental to the interests of all and now governs in a coalition government without being formally interim prime minister. The constitutional and political debate continues and the country was not locked.
I repeat: How many Italian politicians would do? Now, I do not want morals and moralism, nor, obviously, I would give advice to anyone, let alone to our Prime Minister, elected by the majority of Italians, no doubt, but it seems to me that in Italy the media and all debates revolve around Berlusconi's friend and escort, escort or not, a good part of the government, as well as the Italians would like the prime minister acted as a part (although the last confidence vote, which was plenty of "negotiation", I think : and then say of haggling in Asia).
In other words, Berlusconi has tired many many many, the story of her partying and her erotic-sentimental story are monopolizing the country, engaged im investigations, including investigations and debates in the media. But it could take a leaf from the politicians in a country that has often been mentioned as a symbol of political backwardness and economic structure of feudalism, and so on? It could not resign, leaving his niche, so much money and power already has more than enough, and restore air and breath to Italy, maybe we could deal with something other than that of its young ladies? Italy leave and maybe, just maybe, we could also, over time, to rebuild credibility in international politics.
At least not to lose even with Nepal on the playground of democracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment